Eliciting
Eliciting is the technique of drawing language, ideas, or knowledge from learners rather than simply telling them. Instead of saying "The past tense of 'go' is 'went'," the teacher creates a context and prompts students to produce the form themselves. It's a cornerstone of learner-centred teaching — the assumption is that students know more than they think, and the teacher's job is to activate that knowledge before supplying what's missing.
Why It Works
Eliciting serves multiple purposes simultaneously:
- Activates existing knowledge — retrieval strengthens memory traces more than passive reception (the testing effect)
- Reveals what students know — the teacher can calibrate the lesson in real time, spending less time on what's already acquired
- Increases engagement — students who contribute feel invested; it transforms the dynamic from lecture to conversation
- Builds learner confidence — successfully producing a correct answer from one's own knowledge is more empowering than repeating the teacher's model
- Creates a need — when eliciting fails (students can't produce the target), it establishes a genuine information gap that motivates learning
Techniques
| Technique | Example |
|---|---|
| Context + question | Show a picture of someone running for a bus: "What's happening? What verb do we use?" |
| Gap-fill oral | "Yesterday I ______ to the shops" (gesture for past) |
| Visual prompts | Timelines, pictures, realia, gestures |
| Concept questions | "Is it finished? Did it happen in the past?" — close to Concept Checking Questions territory |
| Definitions | "What do we call the person who flies a plane?" |
| Sentence completion | Write a gapped sentence on the board; students complete it |
| Translation | At lower levels, ask for L1 equivalent, then work toward L2 |
Common Mistakes
- Over-eliciting — spending 5 minutes trying to elicit a word nobody knows; if three attempts fail, just tell them. The point is to check, not to play guessing games
- Accepting only one correct answer — eliciting should welcome multiple responses, not fish for the one word in the teacher's head
- Eliciting without context — asking "What's the word?" without any scaffolding turns elicitation into a frustrating quiz
- Using it for everything — some things (spelling rules, irregular forms, cultural knowledge) are better explained directly; eliciting works best for language students have encountered before
- Not responding to wrong answers — when students offer an incorrect form, it's a teaching moment; ignoring it or just saying "no" wastes the diagnostic value of eliciting
Eliciting vs. Telling
The debate isn't binary. Effective teachers elicit when students are likely to know something and tell when they're not. A useful heuristic: elicit to review, tell to introduce, then elicit again to check. Guided Discovery takes this further — structuring an entire sequence so learners work out rules from examples, with eliciting at each step.
Related Concepts
Eliciting is philosophically linked to Learner-centredness — it positions students as active contributors rather than passive receivers. It overlaps with Concept Checking Questions, which are a specific form of elicitation targeting meaning comprehension. In a Guided Discovery lesson, eliciting is the engine that drives learners toward noticing patterns and forming rules.